U.S. Complicit In Terror Plot – FBI, Media Cover-Up of Flight 253 Plot
January 4, 2010 by Ed A. Tor
Filed under Featured, International News, NWO Exposed, Underwear Bomber
U.S. Complicit In Terror Plot – FBI, Media Cover-Up of Flight 253 Plot
mlive.com comments
Uncomfortable facts are emerging from the terror plot on Delta Northwest Airlines Flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit.
First Posted: December 31, 2009. Last updated: January 2, 2010.
High-level help in yet another terror plot is emerging, along with U.S. F.B.I. and D.O.J. cover-up of the facts and outright involvement. History is rife with examples of intelligence agencies setting up terror plots – sometimes with unintended victims and consequences – and the Delta 253 terror plot is the latest such plot to have gone wrong.
Evidence is mounting of U.S. and Israeli complicity in this latest plot. The father Alhaji Umaru Abdul Mutallab of the young terrorist, is an accomplished Nigerian banker and ran the national arms industry (DICON) in partnership with Israel, Nigeria has extensive intelligence links to Israel.
The young man, son of the above, who tried to blow up the plane is a 23 year old Nigerian named Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab; he has attended the British International School, Lome, Togo and studied engineering at the University College, London and was a master’s in international business degree student at the Dubai campus of an Australian University.
A wife of his father, is from Yemen, and frequently travels to the United States, and Umar Farouk Abdul-Mutallab holds a Nigerian passport with a mutiple entry visa to the United States, which is valid until June 2010.
The young man fell out with his father, and chose to visit Yemen and mix with Islamic terrorists, to join with those he believed to be at the opposite end of his father’s allegiances (money, USA, banking, arms industry). He will not have known that those terrorists in Yemen are supported [link] by Israel’s MOSSAD.
From there the young Mutallab sent a text message to his family in Nigeria renouncing them, which led his father, who is received as a VIP by the U.S. embassy in the capital Abuja, to visit that embassy to alert the U.S. of his son’s activities in Yemen, on November 19.
As a result this information is shared by the U.S. embassy with U.S. agencies, resulting in the son being placed on a terror watch list. For this reason, the son cannot show that passport or he would be unable to board the Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam, where he flew after returning via Nigeria from Yemen.
(It is claimed by U.S. media that in Yemen he even met up with some of those released without charge from Guantanamo. 92% of those held and tortured by the U.S. for many years, were innocent of any terrorism, 6% were involved with the Taliban in Afghanistan, and at most 2% were said to have anything to do with Al-Qaida. We can trust the U.S. to have released any real terrorists, and to continue to hold any innocents.)
Instead of thus trying to fly on his compromised passport, the disheveled and poor-looking Mutallab is escorted by an expensively clothed Indian-looking man of around 50 years of age, who tells the boarding gate check box that Mutallab is a Sudanese and needs to board without a passport, and that “we do this all the time.” Mutallab is silent and obedient, the Indian does all the talking.
The check in staff at the gate, naturally refuses, but takes the pair away to see their superior to deal with this case, and the entire conversation up to that point was overheard, unfortunately for the conspirators as it turns out, by successful Michigan lawyer Kurt Haskell, who is sitting a few feet away with his wife Lori, on their way home to the U.S. after a visit to Africa.
Naturally, as all things at European airports, all movements of all people are recorded on CCTV video, so it would be easy to track and identify the “Indian” accomplice of the bomber-to-be. Yet, as happened in London with the infamous 7/7 bombings, this material appears to be withheld from media and the public, and we are told to believe “authorities” there that there is no Indian and no accomplice.
Remarkable too is that these security companies involved with European airports are often Israeli, and run by ex-military or ex-MOSSAD Israeli agents, on the pretext that the threat is from Islamic terrorists, an area Israel has experience with, but which then does not allow for checks against Israeli MOSSAD “false flag” operations, with ever tighter measures implemented against the public.
Meanwhile while the public is subjected to ever more discomforts and irrational fake security measures whilst keeping the terror threat alive, but military jets, private aircraft, and CIA-rented aircraft freely enter and leave European and other airports, often without any security checks or searches, with “VIP” passengers thus able to enter and leave countries often without any visa, as we learnt from the “extra-ordinary” rendition of U.S. abducted prisoners through Europe.
Back to the terror plot under examination. Shortly after the young Mutallab terrorist and his wealthy VIP “Indian” handler disappeared down the corridor to see higher-ups, the passengers along with the Haskells, boarded the flight. As there was no delay for departure to wait for the terrorist, it is evident that clearing the terrorist with the higher-ups took a matter of a minute or so – the “Indian” obviously has a high-level pass (CIA, MOSSAD or high level security clout).
Then the flight proceeds over the Atlantic Ocean with no peculiar events, except for one man sitting somewhere in front of row 19 – the row the young terrorist is seated in – who films much of the flight on his camcorder, always facing back wards toward the terrorist, whom he is recording with extensive video footage. This passenger too, we are not told about, are not to ask about, and we do not get to see his video.
In a CNN News program, passenger Richelle Keepman states, “There was a man that, when we first took off, I noticed about 10 seats ahead of us to the left-hand side. He had a camcorder. I thought maybe this was his first flight and [he] was just excited. And then, when the actual incident occurred, I looked up, and he was the only one standing and filming the entire thing.” In another CNN article, she states, “I don’t know why he was standing up [when] we were supposed to be seated, and he was filming it.”
The Haskells are sitting 8 rows behind, in row 27. Kurt Haskell does not notice the young terrorist again until shortly before landing, when passengers have already been instructed to buckle up for landing. A stewardess walks past mumbling something about the smell of smoke, and sure enough fire flames erupt from around the seat of the young Abdul-Mutallab, who is subdued immediately by passengers, the small and now wounded man offering no resistance.
Click Here for interview with attorney eye witness Kurt Haskell: http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-eyewitness-revelations-confirmed-fbi-cover-up-of-flight-253-attack/
Throughout this incident however, the man continues recording the terrorist, calmly and without interruption. Very unusual behaviour, as observed by many other passengers on board this flight. Then the pilot comes onto the intercom, somewhat nervously, to briefly announce an immediate landing, and the plane is floored, but then remains on the tarmac for 20 minutes before anyone is allowed to leave.
This 20 minute delay, is only something that can happen at a U.S. airport, the inefficiency of security and systems in the U.S. are well known to the world, both pre-9/11 and after it. Anywhere else in the world, such an aircraft with a subdued terrorist on board, would be evacuated immediately, and anywhere else in the world, passengers would be told to leave all baggage behind. Not so in the U.S.A.
After that 20 minute delay putting all passengers at danger of further fire as it had not been established that the aircraft was safe or that the fire had not spread out of sight into the skin of the craft or toward the fuel tanks, or bombs that may be stashed and detonate, the passengers are made to sit with all their luggage for around six hours as they are slowly interviewed by FBI agents and others.
After around an hour, dogs that arrived, sniffing for explosives, loved the smell of explosive substances in an Indian looking man’s bag (Haskell confirms this Indian is much younger than the one in Amsterdam, who was not on board the flight) and this Indian is taken away in handcuffs. Yet, after this too, we no longer can hear any information about this Indian or what happened to him.
After that incident, an FBI officer makes an extraordinary announcement to the passengers, which Haskell recounts to popular alternative media investigative journalist Alex Jones during an extensive interview [link] also detailing his FBI interview, moving them to another location for the remaining 5 hours, and out of sight.
Although very important and reliable witnesses with essential testimony, the Haskells are not contacted for several days. Then the FBI pays a visit to their law offices, show them various photographs, attempt to impeach them, and fail to produce any video from Holland or anywhere else for that matter, fail to show full body photographs of the terrorist, only facial shots. They clearly are fishing for how much the Haskells saw, and not for the (Indian) accomplice(s), at least one of which is obviously working with the full protection of the authorities.
The FBI has changed its story 4 times, first denying the existence of the Indian man arrested at Detroit airport, later claiming he was from another flight, since this news item was first posted by Mathaba. The Haskell’s testimony remains unchanged, persistent, and is not going away with this now all over the Internet.
CONCLUSIONS
Other parts of the story can be guessed at or surmised, for example, that the “Al-Qaida” claims are the work of MOSSAD with its agents in the CIA, and are designed to garner public support for stepped up U.S.-Israeli involvement in the recent war between the Yemeni government and those terrorists, which have consistently been supported by London and covertly by Israel. Or that the young terrorist thought he would really be blowing himself up and that the well dressed 50-ish year old Indian escort of his was a high-level “Al-Qaida” officer sent to help him and that he was really on a jihad mission and destined for Paradise. Or even that he was hypnotized or drugged. That his handlers knew full well that smoke and burns would only result as they ensured the device would not work (a would-be suicide-bomber can never test their equipment in advance, for obvious reasons), and that they would have a wall-to-wall TV worldwide coverage of the ongoing threat of Al-Qaida, terrorism, and of the “need” to take away further liberties in order to defeat it.
The timing of the latest terror threat could not be more convenient for the US terror and war industry: only two weeks prior president Obama was refused an extension and expansion of the infamous Patriot Act rushed in after 9/11 and since then used extensively for spying on the American populace. At the time the administration was only granted a 60 day extension until February. The broadcast of a “live” terror attack on an American aircraft will ensure that the CIA gets everything they ask for next time round. It will also boost the calls for a direct American involvement in Yemen, where the Obama administration has started a proxy war through Saudi Arabia, and it will give the security industry the green light for installing the body scanners they trialled in various countries amidst concerns of invasion of privacy. Amsterdam Schiphol has already announced their immediate deployment – this news item incidentally also notes a dutch investigation concluded that it was American security officials at Schiphol, who cleared the passengers to board the flight.
The cat is now literally out of the bag and cannot be put back. The awareness of people of all walks of life, like the Haskells, who are able to observe and think logically, ensures that sound conclusions are drawn on at least some issues such as this one. Several gaping holes are blown in the official version of events: the failure to produce the airport security video from Amsterdam Schipol, the “video passenger” on the plane, and the disappearing Indian(s). This awareness offers some faint glimmer of hope that one day enough people will put their trust, support and money into true news media networks such as Mathaba to stay informed rather than continue to swallow the misleading disinformation and continuously forgive the 3-letter money slave media (MSM) networks for their repeated and ongoing failures to cover news and issues that matter.
Mathaba urges any other witnesses at the airports at Amsterdam and Detroit as well as any passengers or crew from the Northwest Airlines flight, or anyone else with direct information to come forward via our secure contact form and to share that. Mathaba is the only news agency with a secure contact form so that witnesses and whistle-blowers can provide information without fear of being traced by their government, terrorists, or hackers. General contact is also available. We ask that you supply your contact details so that we can follow up and verify, and assure you that we honor the journalist tradition of confidentiality – whatever is told to us in confidence or not to be on the record, is not disclosed. We hope that more good citizens will come forward to back up existing testimonies or offer any further information that may help.
Note: For those wanting to delve deeper into the details of facts, opinions and logical deductions surrounding this case, the links in the article below serve as good starting points for further research.
Related posts:
- Nigerian Man is a Al-CIA-Duh Terrorist – USA Caught in False-Flag Terror Plot
- Flight 253: Latest Terror Attack Attempt is a False-Flag Op Gone Wrong for Government Shills
- Extensive Interview with Kurt Haskell – Witness to Underwear Bomber
- BREAKING NEWS: US Government Admits It Helped Underwear Bomber Board Plane
- US Government: Why we let the Underwear Bomber on airplane








second passenger confirms Kurt Haskell’s story:
Flip side of intelligence failure — poor response
Christine Negroni
With all the attention being paid to the intelligence failures that allowed Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab to board Northwest Airlines Flight 263 with explosives packed into his briefs, it is my hope that the experiences of what happened to the passengers after the plane landed be examined for what seem to be lapses in security and basic crime scene investigation.
Listening to the stories of several passengers, its clear in the first few hours after the removal of Mr. Mutallab from the airplane, some basic safety precautions were not taken. I may have some understanding of why, which I’ll get to shortly. But first, a brief recap.
After the plane was on the ground, uniformed officers boarded and removed Mr. Mutallab and two others who were injured in the tussle to extinguish the fire. Twenty-five to 45-minutes later the passengers were allowed to take their carry-on luggage and leave the plane. They were taken, as a group, directly into the airport baggage claim area, which was empty except for a contingent of uniformed police officers.
Passengers waited for some time, their accounts differ but for perhaps up to an hour until plainclothes law enforcement officers arrived and K9 “sniffer” dogs.
One of the dogs reacted to a passenger who was handcuffed and led away. The rest of the passengers were hurriedly moved to an area deemed “more secure”.
For the next 4-5 hours passengers were interviewed by the plainclothes authorities and allowed to collect their baggage and leave the airport.
Security experts to whom I have spoken expressed alarm about this story for several reasons, which I’ll list point by point below. You can read their specific comments in my blog from January 1.
* By leaving the passengers on the airplane they remained at risk if unknown or undetected accomplices had still been in the aircraft
* By failing to immediately separate the passengers from the carry on luggage, the passengers were at risk from an undetected explosive or other dangerous device
* By allowing the passengers to leave the airplane with their carry on luggage, potential crime scene evidence was removed and undetected explosives or other dangerous devices could have been removed from the aircraft
* By waiting for more than 45 minutes to bring K9 dogs into the area where the passengers were being held, any undetected dangerous device in that luggage could have harmed the passengers and others in the airport including the large complement of law enforcement personnel in the holding area
* By failing to have the passengers place their carry on luggage in a central area in the holding center, some luggage may have been missed by the K9 detection dogs
* By allowing the passengers to leave the airport without physically searching their luggage, undetected devices or other evidence may have been carried out of the airport
I’ve put these points to the Department of Homeland Security and was told that the Federal Bureau of Investigation was in command of the response and that my questions need to be directed there. Stay tuned.
In the meantime, I’ve since learned a few more details about what happened on the flight which leads me to a few tentative conclusions about the law enforcement reaction.
The pilots in command of flight 253 did not know the full scope of what was going on in the cabin because it happened so late in the flight. The pilots were already on short final approach to Detroit airport when the pilot communicating with the ground reported that he heard what sounded like firecrackers going off. Since he did not request assistance, the aircraft was directed to the gate. It was only after the plane was on the ground that anyone at the airport knew there was trouble onboard.
Knowing now that the information about what Mr. Mutallab had done was so late-breaking, it does seem to explain why the reaction of law enforcement was so laid back.
Why did first responders hustle Mr. Mutallab and his subduers off the plane leaving the rest of the cabin uninspected? Probably because they had no idea that they were responding to an attempted terrorist attack. Why were passengers allowed to remove their things and loll around the airport with little concern about what their involvement might have been or what they might have been carrying? Probably for the same reason.
But at some point, more critical thinking should have come into play. I need remind no one that more than eight years have passed since the terror attacks of 9-11. In addition to finding out what’s failing in our nation’s information and intelligence gathering operations, the experience of Flight 253 should be used to find out whether there are gaps in the way law enforcement handles terror events, even if on first blush, they seem to be something less.
SOURCE: http://christinenegroni.blogspot.com/2010/01/flip-side-of-intelligence-failure-poor.html
The airport video needs to be released. The 911 hijackers airport video was released, so what is being hid in this video?