Airport Body Scanners are the NEW Porn Industry
January 7, 2010 by Ed A. Tor
Filed under Featured, International News, NWO Exposed, National News
So on your next flight are willing to sacrifice your right to privacy and gladly accept a full body scan? Is that so? Well the pictures you see on the 6 o’clock news are always blurred. How about a big dose of reality?
BEFORE
Here is an image I pulled off of the internet of a female body scan. Although more detailed than what you have seen, you ain’t seen nothing yet.
AFTER
Now here is this same photograph after spending 30 seconds creating a reverse negative of this image. Any questions?
Not only is this humiliating but if a kid goes through this machine it is child porn. Think about some slightly above minimum wage airport security personnel sitting in a back room loading these images to a memory stick and taking them home at night for his or her jollies. It is going to happen folks. You can take that to the bank. And speaking of bank, how long before the first Hollywood Star’s image ends up on a porn site? How much will the body scan technician be paid for this?
Also this is a poor rendition of the imagery. The actually scan is in hi-def and the operator has the ability to zoom into to see your private parts in great detail.
Government is not your friend. Say no to this bullshit. Say no to this invasion of privacy!
Related posts:
- U.S. Complicit In Terror Plot – FBI, Media Cover-Up of Flight 253 Plot
- BREAKING NEWS: US Government Admits It Helped Underwear Bomber Board Plane
- Extensive Interview with Kurt Haskell – Witness to Underwear Bomber
- UDoNews.com Launches Monday – They Pay You For Your News!
- Yahoo Bitch-Slapped by Cryptome for Publishing Yahoo’s Guide to Spying
I will pay you $500 bucks each for a scan of Angelina Jolie, Madonna, or Kate Hudson!
Holywood’s new movie:
Invasion of the Body Scanners
You are a funny boy Jimmy John. Now run along. Playtime is over.
It looks like only the hotties will be in demand; so, since I am not a hottie, I don’t care.
You either get security or privacy. Which is more important to you?
I was duped. This image is a fake and I apologize to everyone. This image is based on a CGI and then it was altered by creating a negative of it.
That way when I reversed it all of the color detail was exposed. I have tried the same process with what I know to be authentic airport scans but can not duplicate the result I got here.
I contemplated removing this blog entry but decided to leave it for information purposes. As Sal would say: “This is a traction.”
It IS a hoax — there are four GLARING faults that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the image is a hoax.
I’m not going to rely on circumstantial evidence of the photos being stock photos that already exist on the net… I can do FAR better than that, with affirmative proof that what is presented is counterfeit.
PROOF OF COUNTERFEITING #1: The supposed X-ray not only shows counter, but is even tri-tone (light, shadow, and sepia/skin-tone).
PROOF OF COUNTERFEITING #2:
Look at the full color image. Note how the the woman’s jeans form-fit perfectly around the inside of her upper thighs and pelvis. Particularly, note the inverted triangle of “empty” space bounded by the very top of her nner thighs, and the pubic area. In the full-color image, you this area is COMPLETELY UNOBSTRUCTED.
Now note that the supposed X-ray image on the right shows the barrel of the pistol COMPLETELY OBSTRUCTING the same line of sight.
Therefore, these images were NOT made at the same time — which directly contradicts what you would do if you were taking “demonstration” images.
This alone indicates that the supposed “x-ray image” was ACTUALLY the product of adding in the pistol and knife images to a photo of a nude female (either before or after inverting it to make a reverse-tone image).
PROOF OF COUNTERFEITING #3:
Hair. Backscatter images do NOT show hair.
If Backscatter images actually DID show hair, then all you would need to do is wear wool (sheep hair) clothing to hide anything you want behind it — which would ELIMINATE the controversy, because then you “help help, perverts at TSA want to see my [whatever]” would have to do no more than wear an article of wool clothing in the areas of concern, even OUTSIDE of their undergarments.
PROOF OF COUNTERFEITING #4 — the most damning off all.
X-Rays do not detect skin color, where as this supposed x-ray image CLEARLY shows the darker skin color around the nipples.
Please show us an example of a single x-ray of a hand which shows variations in skin color (such as the gripping surfaces of the fingers and palms of people of African descent, or any one with either freckles or age-spots on their hands).
The fact is, you can’t, because x-rays aren’t influenced by melanin by that much of an extent, yet in THIS set of images, the melanin around the nipple has some super-powerful influence on X-rays.
Case closed — the image set a counterfeit and fraudulent, made for the purpose of disinformation.
@ Aaron Kulkis – thank you for the detailed and thoughtful analysis. GREAT JOB exposing this hoax. We do not need hoaxed documents to further our cause. When dis-info makes its way into the Truth Movement we need to stomp it down immediately.
I hope that you become a regular contributor to the Truth Community. We need more like you.
Ed
Mark Dice calls for Michelle Obama to demonstrate airport body scanners and release the nude body scans to the public.
Pervert or public awareness? Please discuss.