Russian Scientists Go Public – CLIMATEGATE is true. UN Scientists Doctored Data

When the Telecrap Urinal reported the Climategate story back on November 23, 2009 the media was slow to respond and when they did they tried to downplay it. They can no longer downplay what has been confirmed as true.

It is now official. Russian Climatologists have gone public and confirmed that the leaked emails and reports are 100% accurate and that UN Scientists and their handlers deliberately doctored, deleted, and omitted data from their models to ‘prove’ their case for anthropogenic global warming. Russia now admits that a lot of the data from their weather stations was omitted, keeping only data that reported warmer temperatures and leaving out the rest – which was most of the stations.

BOMBSHELL – Russian IEA Claims CRU (Thus NOAA/NASA) Probably Tampered With Their Data – From Rionovosta

A discussion of the November 2009 Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident, referred to by some sources as “Climategate,” continues against the backdrop of the abortive UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen (COP15) discussing alternative agreements to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol that aimed to combat global warming.

The incident involved an e-mail server used by the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in Norwich, East England. Unknown persons stole and anonymously disseminated thousands of e-mails and other documents dealing with the global-warming issue made over the course of 13 years.

Controversy arose after various allegations were made including that climate scientists colluded to withhold scientific evidence and manipulated data to make the case for global warming appear stronger than it is.

Climategate has already affected Russia. On Tuesday, the Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report claiming that the Hadley Center for Climate Change based at the headquarters of the British Meteorological Office in Exeter (Devon, England) had probably tampered with Russian-climate data.

The IEA believes that Russian meteorological-station data did not substantiate the anthropogenic global-warming theory. Analysts say Russian meteorological stations cover most of the country’s territory, and that the Hadley Center had used data submitted by only 25% of such stations in its reports. Over 40% of Russian territory was not included in global-temperature calculations for some other reasons, rather than the lack of meteorological stations and observations.

The data of stations located in areas not listed in the Hadley Climate Research Unit Temperature UK (HadCRUT) survey often does not show any substantial warming in the late 20th century and the early 21st century.

The HadCRUT database includes specific stations providing incomplete data and highlighting the global-warming process, rather than stations facilitating uninterrupted observations.
On the whole, climatologists use the incomplete findings of meteorological stations far more often than those providing complete observations.

IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations.
The scale of global warming was exaggerated due to temperature distortions for Russia accounting for 12.5% of the world’s land mass. The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order to assess the scale of such exaggeration.

Global-temperature data will have to be modified if similar climate-date procedures have been used from other national data because the calculations used by COP15 analysts, including financial calculations, are based on HadCRUT research.

RIA Novosti is not responsible for the content of outside sources. Read story here.

ICECAP NOTE: recall it is in Soviet Union that the CRU, NOAA, NASA show the greatest warming. As this story implies, there was no obvious reason for these data centers to be selective about stations. It implies the stations often selected were urban and those with incomplete data, providing more opportunity for mischief.

In other words this is proof of a world-wide conspiracy and this cabal of Elitists and Scientists perpetrated a massive fraud on humanity. This is a criminal enterprise that needs to be dealt with in the world court at The Hague in the Netherlands.

Related posts:

1. 150 Scientists Ask UN to Show Evidence of Human-Caused Global Warming
2. CBC’s Rex Murphy on Climategate: Research Tainted, Scientists Discredited
3. Climategate Scandal Grows: Phil Jones Resigns, Senate Hearings to Begin, Inhofe will take Truth Squad to Copenhagen
4. Climategate: Fallout Escalates – NASA to be sued
5. Climate Change Proven a Hoax – Leaked emails say ‘Doctor the Data’