Fredericton Feminists Set To Hijack 20th Anniversary of Montreal Massacre
December 1, 2009 by Ed A. Tor
Filed under Editorial, Featured, National News, Provincial News
December 3, 2009 is the 20th anniversary of the deaths of 14 women at École Polytechnique in Montreal at the hands of a madman who went on a shooting spree. So with that in mind, a Lunatic Fringe of Feminists from the Public Service Alliance of Canada and the University of New Brunswick intend to hijack the anniversary and use it as a platform to protest the Harper Governments recent Bill C-391 – the abolition of the long gun registry.
First of all, how dare these women compare a crazed madman to us honest, decent, responsible gun owners. I tend to lean towards liberal tendencies but Alan Rock is one SOB that turned me sour against the Liberal Party. The one thing that has pissed me off over the years was all of the BS that I went through because of that government interference in my life.
I am here to tell you that I never complied with the law and never will comply with the law. Simple as that. Now according to the unconstitutional long gun registry I am a criminal. Well no one ever arrested me. I even sent a letter to the government saying I would not comply and continue to possess guns. That is how strongly I feel about this.
I am not a criminal. I am a tax payer. I have never been arrested. I have have given to my community. I am not radical. The registry law may have said that I was a criminal but I was never arrested. Do you want to know why? There are thousands of us in Canada that did the same thing. It is called civil disobedience. We challenged the government to arrest us. They would not. Do you want to know why? They knew that the law would have been struck down on constitutional grounds. The government also knew that we are organized and well funded.
Finally guns…Guns to me are just another household appliance. I know them inside out. Guns are part of my heritage, my culture, my birthright. Register them? Not a chance. I am not going to register my chainsaw, my hunting knives, my hammer, my saws…etc. Guns, like anything that may cause bodily harm, need to be treated with respect.
This law does nothing to protect women from a lunatic hell-bent on killing them. Notta, zilch, zero, zip. These Feminists should be ashamed of themselves. They have hijacked a horrible moment in Canadian history to express their displeasure with Government abolishing an unconstitutional law. I am far from Conservative, but I commend the Harper Government for abolishing it.
All this law did was alienate people. It projected a big city mentality on the rest of Canada. Hunting may not be a way of life in Toronto but it is here. Just look at how big city mentality reacts to a deer running loose in Toronto. S.W.A.T., Fire Department, Animal Resuce, and a whole section of downtown Toronto cordoned off.
So to these women I say, although you have a right to protest, the hijacking of the 20th anniversary to help your cause is sleazy and deplorable.
Related posts:
- ALERT: Toronto under attack by crazed deer. SWAT responds and tasers it
- Was Fredericton Native Andrew Reid Murdered by Police? Texas Rangers says it will take 3 month investigation to find out.
- Beware of the Lottery Police! Win the Lottery and Go to Jail.
- Good News: Canadian Taxman Goes After Evil eBayers – Editorial
- UNCONFIRMED: Nurse at D.E.C.H. in Fredericton Paralyzed From H1N1 Vaccine?
FACT: The CIA funded the Women Liberation Movement. Yes the spooks financed and used Gloria Steinem as their delivery vehicle to ‘empower’ women.
There is a logical reason that they did this. It was to get more women out of the house and into the workforce so the government could increase the their income tax pool.
It was all about the money. It reduced the amount of payouts through family social programs.
Gloria Steinem – How The CIA
Used Feminism To Destabilize Society
By Henry Makow, Ph.D.
TooGoodReports.com
3-19-2
“In the 1960´s, the elite media invented second-wave feminism as part of the elite agenda to dismantle civilization and create a New World Order.”
Since writing these words last week, I have discovered that before she became a feminist leader, Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA spying on Marxist students in Europe and disrupting their meetings. She became a media darling due to her CIA connections. MS Magazine, which she edited for many years was indirectly funded by the CIA.
Steinem has tried to suppress this information, unearthed in the 1970´s by a radical feminist group called “Red Stockings.” In 1979, Steinem and her powerful CIA-connected friends, Katharine Graham of the Washington Post and Ford Foundation President Franklin Thomas prevented Random House from publishing it in “Feminist Revolution.” Nevertheless the story appeared in the “Village Voice” on May 21, 1979.
Steinem has always pretended that she had been a student radical. “When I was in college, it was the McCarthy era,” she told Susan Mitchell in 1997, “and that made me a Marxist.” (Icons, Saints and Divas: Intimate Conversations with Women who Changed the World 1997. p 130) Her bio-blurb in June 1973 MS. Magazine states: “Gloria Steinem has been a freelance writer all her professional life. Ms magazine is her first full-time salaried job.”
Not true. Raised in an impoverished, dysfunctional family in Toledo Ohio, Steinem somehow managed to attend elite Smith College, Betty Friedan´s alma mater. After graduating in 1955, Steinem received a “Chester Bowles Student Fellowship” to study in India. Curiously, an Internet search reveals that this fellowship has no existence apart from Gloria Steinem. No one else has received it.
In 1958, Steinem was recruited by CIA´s Cord Meyers to direct an “informal group of activists” called the “Independent Research Service.” This was part of Meyer´s “Congress for Cultural Freedom,” which created magazines like “Encounter” and “Partisan Review” to promote a left-liberal chic to oppose Marxism. Steinem, attended Communist-sponsored youth festivals in Europe, published a newspaper, reported on other participants, and helped to provoke riots.
One of Steinem´s CIA colleagues was Clay Felker. In the early 1960´s, he became an editor at Esquire and published articles by Steinem which established her as a leading voice for women´s lib. In 1968, as publisher of New York Magazine, he hired her as a contributing editor, and then editor of Ms. Magazine in 1971. Warner Communications put up almost all the money although it only took 25% of the stock. Ms. Magazine´s first publisher was Elizabeth Forsling Harris, a CIA-connected PR executive who planned John Kennedy´s Dallas motorcade route. Despite its anti establishment image, MS magazine attracted advertising from the crème of corporate America. It published ads for ITT at the same time as women political prisoners in Chile were being tortured by Pinochet, after a coup inspired by the US conglomerate and the CIA.
Steinem´s personal relationships also belie her anti establishment pretensions. She had a nine-year relationship with Stanley Pottinger, a Nixon-Ford assistant attorney general, credited with stalling FBI investigations into the assassinations of Martin Luther King, and the ex-Chilean Foreign Minister Orlando Latelier. In the 1980´s, she dated Henry Kissinger. For more details, see San Francisco researcher Dave Emory.
Our main misconception about the CIA is that it serves US interests. In fact, it has always been the instrument of a dynastic international banking and oil elite (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan) coordinated by the Royal Institute for Internal Affairs in London and their US branch, the Council for Foreign Relations. It was established and peopled by blue bloods from the New York banking establishment and graduates of Yale University´s secret pagan “Skull and Bones” society. Our current President, his father and grandfather fit this profile.
The agenda of this international cabal is to degrade the institutions and values of the United States in order to integrate it into a global state that it will direct through the United Nations. In its 1947 Founding Charter, the CIA is prohibited from engaging in domestic activities. However this has never stopped it from waging a psychological war on the American people. The domestic counterpart of the “Congress for Cultural Freedom” was the “American Committee for Cultural Freedom.” Using foundations as conduits, the CIA controlled intellectual discourse in the 1950´s and 1960´s, and I believe continues to do so today. In The The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters, Francis Stonor Saunders estimates that a thousand books were produced under the imprint of a variety of commercial and university presses, with covert subsidies.
The CIA´s “Project Mockingbird” involved the direct infiltration of the corporate media, a process that often included direct takeover of major news outlets. “By the early 1950´s,” writes Deborah Davis, in her book Katharine the Great : Katharine Graham and Her Washington Post Empire, the CIA owned respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communication vehicles, plus stringers, four to six hundred in all.” In 1982 the CIA admitted that reporters on the CIA payroll have acted as case officers to agents in the field. Philip Graham, publisher of the Washington Post, who ran the operation until his “suicide” in 1963, boasted that “you could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for a couple of hundred dollars a month.”
I was born in 1949. Idealists in my parent´s generation were disillusioned when the Communist dream of universal brotherhood turned out to be a shill for a brutal despotism. My own generation may discover that our best instincts have also been manipulated and exploited. There is evidence that the 60´s drug counter culture, the civil rights movement, and anti-war movement, like feminism, were CIA directed. For example, the CIA has admitted setting up the National Student Association as a front in 1947. In the early 1950´s the NSA opposed the attempts of the House Un American Activities Committee to root out Communist spies. According to Phil Agee Jr., NSA officers participated in the activities of SNCC, the militant civil rights group, and Students for a Democratic Society, a radical peace group.
According to Mark Riebling, the CIA also may have used Timothy Leary. Certainly the agency distributed LSD to Leary and other opinion makers in the 1960s. Leary made a generation of Americans turn away from active participation in society and seek fulfillment “within.” In another example of the CIA´s use of drugs to interfere in domestic politics, Gary Webb describes how in the 1980´s, the CIA flooded Black ghettos with cocaine.
I won´t attempt to analyze the CIA´s motivation except to suggest what these acts have in common: They demoralized, alienated and divided Americans. The elite operates by fostering division and conflict in the world. Thus, we don´t realize who the real enemy is. For the same reason, the CIA and elite foundations also fund the diversity and multi cultural movements.
Feminism has done the most damage. There is no more fundamental yet delicate relationship in society than male and female. On it depends the family, the red blood cell of society. Nobody with the interests of society at heart would try to divide men and women. Yet the lie that men have exploited women has become the official orthodoxy.
Man loves woman. His first instinct is to nurture (“husband”) and see her thrive. When a woman is happy, she is beautiful. Sure, some men are abusive. But the vast majority have supported and guided their families for millennium.
Feminists relentlessly advance the idea that our inherent male and female characteristics, crucial to our development as human beings, are mere “stereotypes.” This is a vicious calumny on all heterosexuals, 95% of the population. Talk about hate! Yet it is taught to children in elementary schools! It is echoed in the media. Lesbians like Rosie O´Donnell are advanced as role models.
All of this is calculated to create personal confusion and sow chaos among heterosexuals. As a result, millions of American males are emasculated and divorced from their relationship to family (the world and the future.) The American woman has been hoodwinked into investing herself in a mundane career instead of the timeless love of her husband and children. Many women have become temperamentally unfit to be wives and mothers. People, who are isolated and alone, stunted and love-starved, are easy to fool and manipulate. Without the healthy influence of two loving parents, so are their children.
Feminism is a grotesque fraud perpetrated on society by its governing elite. It is designed to weaken the American social and cultural fabric in order to introduce a friendly fascist New World Order. Its advocates are sanctimonious charlatans who have grown rich and powerful from it. They include a whole class of liars and moral cripples who work for the elite in various capacities: government, education and the media. These imposters ought to be exposed and ridiculed.
Women´s oppression is a lie. Sex roles were never as rigid as feminists would have us believe. My mother had a successful business in the 1950´s importing watch straps from Switzerland. When my father´s income increased, she was content to quit and concentrate on the children. Women were free to pursue careers if they wanted to. The difference was that their role as wife and mother was understood, and socially validated, as it should be.
Until Gloria Steinem and the CIA came along.
Tell me Ed, were you dropped on your head as a baby, or were you born without a brainstem? Do soem real research (not on the back pages of the NRA weekly) and find out if there are people in the world who don’t think that a gun, which to the best of my recollection has no other purpose than to murder things, is the same as a canopener or any other kitchen appliance. Please look at the numbers; e.g. how many people are shot in Canada vs USA in relation to the number of cowboys walking around with guns in their hands, how many domestic disturbancers end in death vs how many were because some retarded redneck who thinks killings things is a “rural way of life” an killed their wife?(in case you didn’t notice wives are generally women, not sheep or wharever you have shacked up with)?
The Montreal massacre is a perfect example of the kind of slow-witted hippocracy that trivializes womens’ issues while protecting the rights of idiots hiding behind the fact that they should have a right to slaughter lesser animals and be given the freedom to do the same to humans, as long as they promise not to do so on the honour system, as long as no-one pisses them off and women do what they are told, and they “respect” their weapons.
Given the fact that the victims of the montreal massacre were all women, slaughtered with a gun, I think you are the one hijacking the event, not PSAC. They have every right to this event; you are just trying to use it to protect your ability to own killing instruments.
You sir, are an unmitigated, tightly puckered, asshole.
Well Randy when you are in a debate it is important that you come prepared.
You said guns only murder things?
Well Randy the only ‘THING’ that can be murdered is another human. You can not murder animals. You can not murder inanimate objects.
So Randy you have shown a couple of ‘THINGS’ with your statement.
1) You have no respect for humanity by referring to us as ‘THINGS’
2) You have the intelligence of a gnat. An intellectual midget.
I will stop picking apart your argument because it is obvious that momma just dressed you and I do not want to be accused of bullying. Now grab your lunch bucket and get out the door. You don’t want to be late for school.
You said: “You sir, are an unmitigated, tightly puckered, asshole.”
Well at least you called me sir. There may be hope for you.
Now run along little fella. Santa is watching.
Gee, thanks Ed.
I have no intent to “debate” the subject with you, since you are obviously beyond reason; mine were just passing comments, such one would make when you see a dog turd on the sidewalk- “look, it’s a dog turd!” It was a nice effort on your part to try shifting the focus to semantics though. I am no longer wallowing in your stupidity blog, so don’t be offended if you don’t hear from me again. Get some professional help, respect your weapon and have a nice life.
PS- we prefer the term “mental little people” Santa has an IP address like everyone else; watch all you want fatboy.
You have no intention to debate because you came unarmed to a battle of the wits. You have failed to demonstrate that the gun registry saves lives. You have also failed to demonstrate that this was nothing other than a hijacking of one issue with another.
No matter though. This issue got no coverage in the media, which is what it deserved. All that you have done is demonstrate that left-wing lunacy is alive and well in certain parts of society. You are the weakest link. Good bye.
No matter what these lefties think, getting rid of this wasteful and unconstitutional law gives Canada some sense of normalcy and gets us back to our heritage and basis for which this country was founded. Most of these wingnut libbies and the Randy’s of the world are, in effect, Fascists for supporting this shit law. You are 100% correct. They are hijacking the memory of these women who were killed by a madman. Registered or not the outcome would have been the same.
Chew on this lefties: Canadians do have the Right to Bear Arms.
Many Canadians believe that there is no Right of the citizen to keep arms for their own use and defense, like the US Second Amendment, in Canadian law. To those citizens, I would suggest a bit of reading up on our own history and legal framework. Our right to bear arms is not mentioned in recent documents such as the Constitution or Charter because it’s already stated elsewhere in Canadian law.
Our right to keep and bear arms in our own or the country’s defense comes from exactly the same place as the American one — English Common Law, the English Bill of Rights 1689, the writings of Sir William Blackstone in his Commentaries on English Law, and others. All these laws (and indeed the full body of English Law), became part of Canadian law on our Confederation in 1867 with the affirmation of the British North America (BNA) Act.
We have this Right, though our previous Liberal government attempted to suppress it and deny citizen’s their age-old right to self-defense with the egregious and unconstitutional (not to mention horrendously expensive) Firearms Act and other proposals.
It leads one to wonder why the government so wants an unarmed and defenceless populace. See The Legal basis for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms in Canada at http://www.rkba.ca/legal_basis_for_rkba.html and see how the Firearms Act (Bill C-68) Violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms http://www.rkba.ca/c68_charter_violations.html
PS We need more people to speak out against these special interest groups. They are ruining the country. Good job Ed.